![]() ![]() This search moves the incremental event (that is, events with the text "Include files modified") forwards in time by 1 second (these event almost always occur on the same second, so 1 second seems to be enough). I can now show that the issues is somehow related to the order of the events. Update: This still occurs in 4.1.x as of 4.1.2. Adding keepevicted=t makes no difference. The first one containing just event #1 and would be marked with closed_txn=0, and the second would include events 2 and 3 just as before, and it should be marked with closed_txn=1. The best theory I have about why this isn't working has to do with transaction automatically discarding non-closed transactions, but if that were the case then adding keepevicted=t should output two transactions. I've tried playing with the different transaction options, but haven't found anything that works as of yet. My transaction still contains just event 2 and 3, just as if did with my first search. I thought that I should be able to add in the leading event by simply adding an OR to my startswith expression, like so:Įventtype=my-backup-job* | transaction fields="host,pid" startswith=("Backing up" OR "Include files modified") endswith="files written KB/min" (The prefix was added for reference and it not part of the actual log message)īefore I realized that I sometimes had incremental backup jobs, I used this search:Įventtype=my-backup-job* | transaction fields="host,pid" startswith=("Backing up") endswith="files written KB/min" In which case the event that indicates that the job is incremental appears before the standard starting event.Ġ4/20 20:18:28(11140) - Backing up /mnt/snap4bak/splunk_var_runĠ4/20 20:19:17(11140) - 4,926 files 120020.89 KB written to DATA-DAILY4 225039.17 KB/minĮxample 2: Incremental backup job (event numbers added) I have the basic case working, however I'm running into trouble when the backup job is incremental. The events I'm trying to group into a transaction are for a backup job. I think I can best explain this by example. The events I'm using don't have any helpful tracking fields that I need, so I have to rely on the startswith and endswith expressions to establish transaction boundaries. If you use a wildcard for the value, NOT fieldA=* returns events where fieldA is null or undefined, and fieldA!=* never returns any events.I'm trying to build transaction that has an optional leading starting event. The following search returns events where fieldA exists and does not have the value "value2". The following search returns everything except fieldA="value2", including all other fields. Searching with the boolean "NOT" comparison operator is not the same as using the "!=" comparison. | search sourcetype=access_combined_wcookie action IN (addtocart, purchase) 5. In the events from an access.log file, search the action field for the values addtocart or purchase. This example shows how to use the IN operator to specify a list of field-value pair matchings. | search host=webserver* status IN(4*, 5*) 4. | search host=webserver* (status=4* OR status=5*)Īn alternative is to use the IN operator, because you are specifying two field-value pairs on the same field. This example searches for events from all of the web servers that have an HTTP client and server error status. This example shows field-value pair matching with wildcards. | search (code=10 OR code=29 OR code=43) host!="localhost" xqp>5Īn alternative is to use the IN operator, because you are specifying multiple field-value pairs on the same field. This example searches for events with code values of either 10, 29, or 43 and any host that is not "localhost", and an xqp value that is greater than 5. This example shows field-value pair matching with boolean and comparison operators. This example shows field-value pair matching for specific values of source IP (src) and destination IP (dst). To learn more about the search command, see How the search command works. The following are examples for using the SPL2 search command. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |